Nasotracheal intubation using the Airtraq® optical laryngoscope in patients with a difficult airway.

To the Editor, We were interested in a recently published case report describing application of the Airtraq optical laryngoscope (Airtraq) for nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in a patient with a predicted difficult airway who was undergoing oral surgery. The authors are to be congratulated on their successful airway management in this challenging case. However, topical anesthesia was performed on only the naris and nasopharynx. In our experience, topical anesthesia of the trachea is also important for successful tracheal intubation and to ensure comfort of the awake patient. Moreover, insertion of a MADgic laryngotracheal atomizer (MAD-LTA) (Wolfe Tory Medical Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA) through the oral and nasal cavities for topical anesthesia of the supraglottic, glottic, and infraglottic areas can be performed quite easily under the visual field of the airway provided by the Airtraq. This technique is well tolerated by the awake sedated patient, possibly due to less stimulation of the oropharyngolaryngeal structures during laryngeal exposure using the Airtraq, as it does not require a ‘‘line of sight’’ to visualize the airway anatomy. In cases where there was difficulty in directing the nasotracheal tube tip into the glottis under direct vision with the Airtraq, the authors used a flexible nasotracheal tube rather than a preformed tube to insert the fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). Preformed nasotracheal tubes are very useful for patients undergoing head and neck surgery because they are easy to secure, they provide convenient surgical access, and they may reduce pressure on the nares. We previously reported methods to improve use of preformed nasotracheal tubes during FOB-guided NTI. Our experience suggests that difficulty in directing the tube tip into the visualized glottis can be challenging when NTI is performed with the Airtraq, especially for pediatric patients. To address this problem, we have used all the techniques described in the recent case report. In some cases, we have found external laryngeal manipulation to be useful in locating the lateral tube tip. Although the nasal version Airtraq provides additional space to facilitate passage of Magill forceps in the absence of a posterior tubeguiding channel, the greater distal angulation of its blade may render their use very awkward. Furthermore, use of Magill forceps can occasionally result in cuff damage. Combined use of the Airtraq and a FOB can enable successful NTI in patients with difficult airways, but disadvantages of this method include the need of two experienced anesthesiologists during tracheal intubation and complex cleaning and sterilization procedures after tracheal intubation. In our practice, the Airtraq and a FOB are used in combination in any situation where the operator is unable to visualize the glottis by the viewfinder, either with or without the epiglottis, i.e., either a CormackLehane grade 3 or grade 4 view via the Airtraq. If only the nasotracheal tube tip is excessively posterior or lateral to the glottis under the Airtraq visualization, we prefer to use a cuff inflation technique to align the tube tip with the glottis. When only a Cormack-Lehane grade 2 view is obtained using the Airtraq or when the glottis is off-centre of the viewfinder, we have recently combined use of the Airtraq and the Eschmann Tracheal Tube Introducer (gum elastic Fu S. Xue and Xu Liao contributed equally to this work.